Click
Chat
 
Du kan vedhæfte PDF, JPG, PNG, DOC(X), XLS(X) og TXT-filer. Klik på ikonet, vælg fil og vent til upload er færdig før du indsender eller uploader endnu en fil.
60
Vedhæft Send
DANMARKS STØRSTE INVESTORSITE MED DEBAT, CHAT OG NYHEDER
12/8 14:51
af investor1989
This session starts in about 10 minutes
12/8 14:56
af Jan Van de Winkel
I am here with David Eatwell, Genmab's CFO, and looking forward to this Q & A.
12/8 14:57
af investor1989
Great. Nice to have you back here
12/8 14:57
af investor1989
Can you start with giving us an update on the most important Developments in the Q2 ?
12/8 14:58
af Jan Van de Winkel
Certainly - the filing of the BLA for daratumumab mono therapy, two regulatory submissions for ofatumumab....
12/8 14:59
af Jan Van de Winkel
...achieved a USD 10 Mn for dara progress in Phase 3, positive results for a Phase 3 in relapsed CLL for ofa....
12/8 14:59
af Jan Van de Winkel
...and entered a commercial agreement with BioNTech in the field of immuno oncology for DuoBody.
12/8 15:00
af Jan Van de Winkel
and of course, encouraging early clinical data for HuMax-TF-ADC, as well as another set of strong financial results.
12/8 15:00
af investor1989
Okay. thats great. You said this morning in the radio that arzerra competition in europe was hard because Ibrutinib was giving out for free. Can you clarify that ?
12/8 15:01
af Jan Van de Winkel
Yes, we have heard that in certain European countries Ibrutinib is made available for free, to patients that may benefit.
12/8 15:01
af troldmanden
Can you shed some light on the actually timeline for FDA dara review. The 60 days review time is that from the date thepriority review is given or is that for the date the final submission was sent in? And second could you repeat the average review time for BTD seen so fare?
12/8 15:02
af Jan Van de Winkel
The process is that we will hear within 60 days from July 9th when we completed the submission...
12/8 15:03
af Jan Van de Winkel
if we get a priority review, then the FDA commits to finalising the review within 6 months ie March 2016.
12/8 15:03
af investor1989
The free Ibrutinib. Is that Jannsen/PCYC that are providing that or are the drug paid by someone else ?
12/8 15:03
af Jan Van de Winkel
The average review time for BTD products is 176 days with a range from 75 days to 315 days.
12/8 15:04
af Jan Van de Winkel
It is Janssen/PCYC.
12/8 15:04
af symmetry
Daratumumab outside MM. Do you think you primarily will go after Relapsed/Refrac "Orphan" indications there? Or are J&J considering developing Dara more broadly (frontline etc.) outside MM to ?
12/8 15:05
af Jan Van de Winkel
It is too early to say, but the first clinical study that is scheduled is the relapsed refractory setting and will involve FL, MCL and DLBCL patients. ...
12/8 15:05
af Jan Van de Winkel
..Preclinically we have obtained very strong data with daratumumab also in AML, Burkitt's Lyphoma and CLL.
12/8 15:06
af troldmanden
Regarding DARA. Is there any milestones related to 1) filing in Europe 2) first sale in Europe. And if so would it be fair to speculate that those milestones would be a bit north of half the milestones for US?
12/8 15:06
af Jan Van de Winkel
We stated in our Guidance that there is a filing milestone in Europe...
12/8 15:07
af Jan Van de Winkel
...it is reasonable to expect there may be a milestone linked to first commercial sale in Europe, and reasonable to expect that both those may be lower than the milestones in the US.
12/8 15:07
af troldmanden
What timeline do you see for possible approval of DARA in Japan?
12/8 15:08
af Jan Van de Winkel
We cannot comment on timings for possible approvals. Janssen has however, recently started a second study in Japan to support potential future filings there.
12/8 15:08
af bongobob
Regarding Humax-TF. Did you reach 54 patients before closing recruitment for study redesign. When is you partner Seattle obligated to take a in/out decision, after the first Phase one study or the new one
12/8 15:10
af Jan Van de Winkel
We presented data on 24 patients at ASCO, and we have expanded the Phase 1 study with extra patients for a total study patient number of approx. 110 patients...
12/8 15:10
af Jan Van de Winkel
...Seattle will make their opt in decision at the end of Phase 1.
12/8 15:10
af investor1989
But the current study is a phase I/II study with the 24 patients the phase I part and the 110 the phase II part. So can they wait until after the 110 patients ?
12/8 15:11
af investor1989
I think bongobob was referring to clinical trials where the study now is "closed for recruitment"
12/8 15:12
af Jan Van de Winkel
The entire study will enroll approx. 110 patients and it is the completion of the entire study which triggers their final opt in obligation.
12/8 15:12
af troldmanden
You have stated that you want to take Humax TF-ADC longer in the clinic before doing any potential partnership, so that you can retain at least 50% of the value. Just to give us some insight we can relate to. How much of the Dara value would you say have retained in your deal with Jansen?
12/8 15:12
af Jan Van de Winkel
Part one of the study is complete (dose escalation) we are now in Part 2.
12/8 15:14
af Jan Van de Winkel
These two deals are very different. In the dara deal we have up to a billion USD of milestones and double digit royalties at no cost. In the HuMax-TF-ADC programme we fund all studies currently and there is an opt in potential for Seattle Genetics for a 50/50 cost and profit sharing.
12/8 15:14
af symmetry
Ofatumumab and Daratumumab (assumed approval in 2016) took 7-8 years from IND to approval. Do you expect you can continue this track record with Humax-TF-ADC and other products, or is it just harder to develop drugs in solid tumors?
12/8 15:15
af Jan Van de Winkel
Depends on the drug and the indication - there are many variables in drug development, but we work as quickly as possible in Genmab.
12/8 15:15
af sertolicell
Dr. Van de Winkel, I have some questions regarding more long-term immunotherapy visions and goals: Genmab acquired an anti-CD19 Ab early this year. The CD19 area is rapidly evolving regarding new technolgies such as CART/CTL019 (Novartis/U-Penn). Is Genmab considering to go into adoptive T cell transfer/CART/TILs at a later stage - either with anti-CD19 or other mAbs (eg. anti-CD38?)
12/8 15:16
af Jan Van de Winkel
At present Genmab is firmly focused on antibody therapeutic approaches. This means that CAR-approaches for cancer fall outside of our current focus.
12/8 15:16
af troldmanden
Could you perhaps give a general update on the Hexabody development. How many programs do you have and how does the interest for potential partners look here 3 years after the reveal of the technology
12/8 15:17
af Jan Van de Winkel
We have multiple HexaBody programs in the Genmab proprietary pipeline - HexaBody candidates represent over 10 percent of our preclinical candidates....
12/8 15:18
af Jan Van de Winkel
...there is significant interest by both large pharma and biotech companies for access to HexaBody, both for cancer and non cancer therapeutic approaches.
12/8 15:18
af Helge Larsen/PI-redaktør
Genmab has a large sum marked for buying up in the market. Which special medical remedies do you find especially interesting to add to your business?
12/8 15:19
af Jan Van de Winkel
We are very focused on Immuno Oncology, one of the hottest areas in oncology at the time, and have already three partnerships in this area.
12/8 15:19
af symmetry
You have promissed we would get a broader look into your preclinical pipeline sometime this year. Is that still your expectations?
12/8 15:20
af Jan Van de Winkel
Absolutely, we would hope that our R&D update seminar in December (following the ASH conference in Orlando) will provide an opportunity to discuss some of the exciting preclinical programs we are working on.
12/8 15:21
af troldmanden
How much data do you think you would need to have, before you can get a deal where you retain 50% of the value. Phase 3 data?
12/8 15:22
af Jan Van de Winkel
We are signing deals now where we retain 50% of the value of products, such as the exciting BioNovion and BioNTech deals.
12/8 15:22
af symmetry
Do you still expect more IND this year? and do you expect duobody IND either from J&J or from your own products?
12/8 15:23
af Jan Van de Winkel
In addition to the two INDs already filed for Genmab created antibodies in 2015 we would anticipate additional filings from partners.
12/8 15:24
af investor1989
The Pierre Fabre Duobody is new. Who are they, and what target is that for ?
12/8 15:24
af Jan Van de Winkel
This is a well established French pharma company, with a strong cancer therapeutic pipeline...
Nyeste Først - Ældste Først   Side 1/2